 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Committee for a Better Twin Rivers v. Twin Rivers Homeowners' Ass'n, DOCKET NO. A-4047-03T2,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, February 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The expressive rights guaranteed by N.J. Const. art. I, paras. 6 and 18 applied to planned community associations with regard to its setting and administering standards for its residents, such as the residents' right to post political signs and use the community room, since such communities had a quasi-municipal status.
|
|||||
| Dolce v. Dolce, DOCKET NO. A-1561-04T2,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, February 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An order declaring the parties' son emancipated as of age eighteen and terminating the father's child support obligation, despite a provision in the property settlement agreement establishing age 23 as an emancipation event, was reversed; nothing in the law prevented support from continuing, and the parties' agreement was not unfair or inequitable.
|
|||||
| In re Regojo, D-37 September Term 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, February 8, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Perkins v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., DOCKET NO. A-2779-04T5,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, February 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a vehicle buyer sued the manufacturer under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act, N.J. Stat. Ann. §§ 56:8-1 to -20, as an allegedly substandard part did not fail or require repair or replacement within the warranty period, she failed to state a claim under the CFA, as she did not sustain an "ascertainable loss" under N.J. Stat. Ann. § 56:8-19.
|
|||||
| Rivelli v. MH&W Corp., DOCKET NO. A-1010-04T3,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, February 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although under N.J. Stat. Ann. § 34:15-15 an employer was responsible for reasonably necessary treatment for an employee's work-related condition, a finding as to whether the employee's hyperlipidemia was related to his compensable heart condition was necessary to determine liability for the continued prescription of a cholesterol-reducing drug.
|
|||||
| Saks v. Ng, DOCKET NO. A-1471-04T1,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, February 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a medical negligence case, a doctor was entitled to the standard "exercise of medical judgment" jury charge, because his expert opined that the alternative method of anesthesia suggested by the patient's expert would have been inappropriate, and the patient's expert admitted that the choice of anesthesia was a matter of medical judgment.
|
|||||
| In re Tobin, D-72 September Term 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, February 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
