 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Gazis v. Miller, A-32 September Term 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, March 20, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Excess insurer could not deny coverage, absent a showing of an appreciable prejudice or breach of its notice provision, based on an insured's failure to comply with the policy's 120-day notice provision. Further, such kept intact the strong public policy in favor of protecting innocent victims of automobile accidents.
|
|||||
| State in Interest of M.C., DOCKET NO. A-7024-03T5, A-7026-03T5, A-7027-03T5,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, March 20, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Juvenile court did not err in imposing suspended sentences; while New Jersey Code of Juvenile Justice, N.J. Stat. Ann. §§ 2A:4A-20 to -91, was silent on the issue, its provisions were sufficiently flexible to permit New Jersey courts to impose suspended sentences as a viable disposition, given Code's fundamental rehabilitative and penal objectives.
|
|||||
| In re Lynch, D-54 September Term 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, March 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Vagias v. Woodmont Properties, L.L.C., DOCKET NO. A-5029-04T5,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, March 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A realtor's misrepresentation about the location of a house constituted a violation of the Consumer Fraud Act, N.J. Stat. Ann. § 56:8-2, since the location of the property was critical to the buyers' decision, they were precluded from sending their son to a school they had chosen, and the realtor was aware of the importance of the location issue.
|
|||||
| Libertarian Party of Cent. New Jersey v. Murphy, DOCKET NO. A-2890-04T2,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, March 23, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Township's imposition of a facially inordinate fee ($ 55) for copying onto a computer diskette information it stored electronically placed an unreasonable burden on the right of access guaranteed by New Jersey Open Public Records Act, and violated principle set by N.J. Stat. Ann. § 47:1A-5(b) that the fee should reflect actual cost of duplication.
|
|||||
| O'Donnell v. Singleton, DOCKET NO. A-5288-04T1,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, March 23, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court affirmed the trial court's order requiring a mother to share the driving responsibilities necessary to effectuate the father's parenting time, which entailed her traveling 80 miles, round-trip, twice every other week, because the order was not an abuse of discretion but was a reasonable resolution of the problem.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
