 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Camden Iron & Metal, Inc. v. Klehr, Harrison, Harvey, Branzberg & Ellers, LLP, DOCKET NO. A-1222-05T3,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, March 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred by enjoining attorney and firm from representing Pennsylvania-based client in a proceeding before Pennsylvania agency, as New Jersey courts lacked subject matter jurisdiction to enforce Pennsylvania's rules of professional conduct, and New Jersey's ethics rules did not provide an independent basis for a cause of action.
|
|||||
| City of Atlantic City v. California Ave. Ventures, DOCKET NO. A-1300-04T1,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, March 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Tax court properly dismissed a city's appeal of an order decreasing a tax assessment on a taxpayer's property. Due to the position the city took in its settlement in tax court in an unrelated case, it was judicially estopped from arguing against that position in the instant case.
|
|||||
| Deo v. Morello, DOCKET NO. ESX-L-9516-05,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, LAW DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY, March 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A decedent's wife, not his daughters, was entitled to survivor benefits under his ERISA-governed plans because the premarital agreement the wife signed was not a valid or effective waiver of her right to the benefits, since it lacked the waiver requirements set out in 29 U.S.C.S. § 1055(c) of ERISA.
|
|||||
| Maher v. County of Mercer, DOCKET NO. A-1810-04T1,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, March 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's N.J. Tort Claims Act claim accrued not when she was burned at county facility, but when she was diagnosed as suffering from staph infection acquired through the burn. Her resulting illness and hospitalizations in the 90 days after accrual were extraordinary circumstances entitling her to file late notice under N.J. Stat. Ann. § 59:8-9.
|
|||||
| Pryce v. Scharff, DOCKET NO. A-2190-04T3,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, March 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under N.J. Ct. R. 5:7-5(g), child support judgments were held to bear post-judgment interest and where the support was being paid through the Probation Division, the Probation Division must calculate and collect the interest when it locates assets on which to execute or when the debtor seeks a warrant of satisfaction.
|
|||||
| State v. Brown, DOCKET NO. A-4885-03T4,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, March 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: To the extent inmate's sentence was above the mandatory one-third for the predicate crime under N.J. Stat. Ann. § 2C:43-6(c) of New Jersey's Graves Act, it was discretionary. As inmate had served more than mandatory minimum parole ineligibility term, court was authorized under N.J. Ct. R. 3:21-10(b)(1) to change his sentence to a treatment program.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
