 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| George v. City of Newark, DOCKET NO. A-0578-04T5,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, March 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State agency erred in reinstating employee on grounds that lab's failure to correctly test his urine sample deprived him of potentially exculpatory evidence needed to challenge positive drug tests. To determine whether due process violation occurred, agency had to apply principles used in criminal proceedings when State lost physical evidence.
|
|||||
| In re Block, D-111 September Term 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, March 29, 2006, Decided , March 29, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| J.G. Ries & Sons, Inc. v. Spectraserv, Inc., DOCKET NO. A-5521-04T2,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, March 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in disqualifying a law firm that represented plaintiff. Defendant's membership in a trade association represented by the firm did not make it the firm's client for purposes of N.J. Ct. R. Prof. Conduct 1.7, as there was no "substantial relationship" between subject matter of firm's representation of plaintiff and of association.
|
|||||
| Szemple v. Department of Corrections, DOCKET NO. A-4767-03T3,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, March 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As an inmate's "high risk" classification merely subjected him to having additional prison guards attend him when he was escorted from the prison, that heightened scrutiny was not an "atypical and significant hardship" and thus did not give him a due process right to a hearing as to the propriety of the classification.
|
|||||
| Community Hosp. Group, Inc. v. Blume Goldfaden Berkowitz Donnelly Fried & Forte, P.C., DOCKET NO. A-5561-03T1,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, March 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under the New Jersey Hospital Patients Bill of Rights Act, a hospital faced fines, loss of all licenses, and suits by its patients for breaching its duty to ensure the confidentiality of their medical records. Therefore, it had standing to seek injunctive relief to protect its medical records when third party obtained them without authorization.
|
|||||
| In re Cattani, D-97 September Term 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, March 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re DeMasi, D-99 September Term 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, March 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
