 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Aguerre v. Schering-Plough Corp., DOCKET NO. A-1940-04T2,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, May 25, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a wrongful termination suit, it was held that the Foreign Country Money-Judgments Recognition Act (FCMJRA), N.J.S.A. §§ 2A:49A-16 to -24, may be pled as an affirmative defense and that plaintiffs' whistle-blowing allegations under N.J.S.A. §§ 34:19-1 to -14 fell squarely within New Jersey's public policy exception to the FCMJRA.
|
|||||
| Jolley v. Marquess, DOCKET NO. A-4513-05T2,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, May 25, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A carrier that issued a malpractice insurance policy to a law firm was required to provide a defense and possible indemnification to one of the firm's former partners for acts of malpractice committed after he left the firm.
|
|||||
| Barber v. Shop-Rite of Englewood & Assocs., DOCKET NO. A-4058-06T1,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, May 30, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Newspapers were improperly denied access to a civil post-verdict jury voir dire, as the First Amendment applied to such proceedings, there was no compelling, overriding interest to rebut the presumption of access, and the trial court's concerns about jury confidentially and candor could be adequately addressed through less restrictive alternatives.
|
|||||
| Binder v. Price Waterhouse & Co., L.L.P., DOCKET NO. A-5115-05T3,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, May 30, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A bankruptcy trustee's malpractice suit against an accounting firm was properly dismissed as time-barred; N.J.S.A. § 2A:14-1's six-year statute of limitations was not equitably tolled because the trustee did not act promptly to file his state court action after the dismissal of the same cause of action by a federal court.
|
|||||
| Brenman v. Demello, A-13 September Term 2006,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, May 30, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In automobile accident cases, expert testimony was not required as a condition precedent to the admission of photographs of vehicle damage when the cause or extent of a plaintiff's injuries were at issue. Such evidence was relevant via N.J.R.E. 401, unless, pursuant to N.J.R.E. 403, its probative value was outweighed by the risk of undue prejudice.
|
|||||
| State v. Baum, DOCKET NO. A-1576-06T5,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, May 30, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under Fourth Amendment, a 26-minute roadside investigation was properly expanded beyond initial reason for stop because defendant driver was nervous, failed to produce a license or insurance card, did not know who owned car, and she and defendant passenger told inconsistent stories as to whether they had traveled to New York by bus or in the car.
|
|||||
| University Cottage Club of Princeton N.J. Corp. v. New Jersey Dep't of Envtl. Prot., A-65 September Term 2006,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, May 30, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an appeal challenging the denial of historic-site tax exemption, because the applicant satisfied all of the relevant standards in effect when it perfected its petition for tax-exempt status, it was entitled to such certification and did not have to satisfy the more stringent requirements of N.J.S.A. §§ 54:4-3.54a, -3.54b, and -3.54c.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
