 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Lopez, A-49 September Term 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, June 1, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: New Jersey's robbery statute, N.J. Stat. Ann. § 2C:15-1(a), did not encompass afterthought robbery since the intention to steal must precede or be coterminous with the use of force. As such, defendant was entitled to a new trial on a robbery charge since the trial court erred by instructing the jury on afterthought robbery.
|
|||||
| Harry's Lobster House Corp. v. Director, Div. of Taxation, Docket No. 004978-2004,
TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY, June 5, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A taxpayer's untimely protest was dismissed because the Director of the Division of Taxation was not bound by an alleged agreement to re-audit since a closing or compromise agreement was never put in writing, as required by N.J. Stat. Ann. § 54:53-12, nor was an Attorney General opinion obtained, as required by N.J. Stat. Ann. § 54:53-14.
|
|||||
| Mansoldo v. State, A-57 September Term 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, June 5, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an inverse condemnation suit where a taking was deemed to have resulted from an agency regulation prohibiting the construction of two homes on a parcel in a floodway, the lower courts erred by not following applicable standards of law by limiting the property owner's compensation to the permitted uses of a parkland, open space, or a parking lot.
|
|||||
| State v. Denofa, A-11 September Term 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, June 5, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's murder conviction was erroneously reversed on appeal based on the trial court's failure to submit the issue of whether the murder was committed in New Jersey to the jury as, though territorial jurisdiction was an element of murder, defendant failed to request such a charge and no factual dispute existed as to where the crime occurred.
|
|||||
| Potente v. County of Hudson, A-56 September Term 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, June 6, 2006 , Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Pre-judgment interest was available under the Law Against Discrimination (LAD), N.J. Stat. Ann. §§ 10:5-1 to -49, however, in a former employee's LAD suit against a county, the trial court improvidently granted a directed verdict on the subject of failure to accommodate, which required a new trial on remand.
|
|||||
| State v. Berezansky, DOCKET NO. A-4283-04T3,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, June 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In DWI case, defendant's right of confrontation was violated by admission of lab certificate concerning his blood alcohol level without giving him opportunity to confront its preparer. Certificate was not admissible under N.J. R. Evid. 803(c)(6) or (8), as it was not prepared in ordinary course of government business, but to prove element of crime.
|
|||||
| In re Application of Taylor, DOCKET NO. CPM-L-156-06,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, LAW DIVISION, CAPE MAY COUNTY, June 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Though prosecutor established his staff was overworked and underpaid compared to those in other prosecutor's offices, court granted pay increases under N.J.S.A. § 2A:158-7 only to employees whose salaries had not been established through collective negotiations process, as the prosecutor could not disclaim positions he had taken in that process.
|
|||||
| In re Petition For Substantive Certification of Borough of Montvale, DOCKET NO. A-2579-04T3,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, June 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantive certification granted to a borough pursuant to N.J. Stat. Ann. § 52:27D-314(a) regarding its fair share affordable housing plan was upheld on appeal where an objecting developer failed to provide any expert planning reports or other legally competent evidence to counter the plan's inclusion of only 32 of the developer's 45 acres.
|
|||||
| Menorah Chapels at Millburn v. Needle, DOCKET NO. A-3499-03T5,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, June 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a collection suit regarding a contract for funeral services and a customer's counterclaim for breach of that contract, the customer's emotional distress claim was erroneously dismissed as the recoverability of damages for emotional distress arising out of a breach of a funeral services contract was supported by precedent of other jurisdictions.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
