|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
New Jersey - June 9 - June 14, 2006
|
| |
Stoeckel v. Township of Knowlton, DOCKET NO. A-3753-04T3,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, June 9, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Land owner sued a township attorney, alleging, inter alia, he made misrepresentation about status of financing for road. As owner failed to give attorney notice of claim under New Jersey Tort Claims Act, all claims against him except for tortious intentional conduct were barred by Act's statute of limitations, N.J.S.A. §§ 59:8-8, -9.
|
|
| |
St. Louis, LLC v. Final Touch Glass & Mirror, Inc., DOCKET NO. A-6420-04T1,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, June 12, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: In a breach of contract suit involving a construction contract, it was held that the measure of damages for a construction defect to real property was either decrease in market value or cost of repair, depending on the circumstances, with the sale of the property prior to trial not limiting the injured party to decrease in market value damages.
|
|
| |
State v. Carroll, DOCKET NO. A-4086-04T4,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, June 12, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Under N.J. Const. art. I, para. 7, warrantless search and seizure from stolen car of bag containing drugs, following police chase and arrest of defendant, was not justified under incident-to-arrest exception, but court properly denied defendant's suppression motion as search was constitutional under automobile exception and abandonment doctrine.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Ocean Seniors, LLC v. Township of Ocean Sewerage Auth., DOCKET NO. L-4482-03,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, LAW DIVISION, MONMOUTH COUNTY, June 14, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: The connection fee a sewerage authority charged a developer was not improper, under N.J.S.A. § 40:14A-8, because the authority did not have to include the sewage flows from other communities in calculating the connection fee, because, rather than having individual customers in those communities, the authority had bulk contracts with each community.
|
|
| |
State v. Elders, DOCKET NO. A-4004-04T2, A-4006-04T2, A-4008-04T2, A-4009-04T2, A-4012-04T2, A-4014-04T2,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, June 14, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: In a drug seizure case, troopers had reasonable suspicion to search a disabled vehicle based on the nervousness of the six defendants, the fact that they indicated they needed no help, and other factors. Advice that a dog was going to be called if the driver did not consent was not coercion that negated the voluntary, signed consent given.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|