|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
New Jersey - June 29 - July 10, 2006
|
| |
Gusciora v. McGreevey, DOCKET NO. A-2842-04T1,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, June 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: In a suit challenging the use of all Direct Recording Electronic voting machines for the November 2004 election, the appellate court held that N.J.S.A. §§ 19:48-1 and 19:53A- 3(i), providing for a paper record of every vote, remedied alleged violations of N.J. Const. art. II, § 1, para. 3, and the case was remanded to monitor compliance.
|
|
| |
In re Subryan, D-34 September Term 2004,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, June 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Judge was suspended from performance of judicial duties, without pay, for two months, because judge's unwanted overture to law clerk (kissing her against her will), violated both N.J. Ct. R. Canon 1 and 2(A), and N.J. Ct. R. 2:15-8(a)(6); two-month suspension underscored importance of a workplace free of gender discrimination and sexual harassment.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Feldman v. Hunterdon Radiological Assocs., A-71 September Term 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, July 5, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Under the Conscientious Employee Protection Act, N.J. Stat. Ann. §§ 34:19-1 to -8, a shareholder-director's title or ownership interest did not determine employee status, rather, the inquiry was fact-intensive, focusing on the professional association's direction/control and that person's true power and vulnerability within the association.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
