LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - New Jersey - July 19, 2006

  
Bender v. Adelson, A-37 September Term 2005, SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, July 19, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: In a medical malpractice suit, although the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it barred defendants' experts, the comment made by plaintiff's counsel on summation about the absence of those experts had the capacity to mislead the jury and effected a miscarriage of justice requiring a new trial, pursuant to N.J. Ct. R. 4:49-1(a).

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Del Vecchio v. Hemberger, DOCKET NO. A-5284-04T2, A-5653-04T2, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, July 19, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where a judgment of foreclosure was entered a mere one day after execution of a certification of non-redemption under N.J. Stat. Ann. § 54:5-86, there was nothing improper in the entry of that judgment to warrant vacating it pursuant to N.J. Ct. R. 4:50-1; therefore, any post-judgment redemption by the property owners was barred.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
International Union of Operating Engineers # 68 Welfare Fund v. Merck & Co., Inc., M-1510/M-1511, SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, July 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Roberts v. State, Div. of State Police, DOCKET NO. A-5405-04T2, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, July 19, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: When the conduct of a State Police trooper was the subject of a criminal investigation and an investigation by the State Police to determine whether disciplinary charges should be filed, the 45-day period in N.J. Stat. Ann. § 53:1-33 did not commence until sufficient information was provided to the Superintendent to support the need for discipline.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Sahli v. Woodbine Bd. of Educ., DOCKET NO. A-3591-04T2, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, July 19, 2006, Decided , July 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: School board was not obliged to indemnify board counsel in a suit against him by a former school employee because N.J. Stat. Ann. § 18A:16-6 provided protection only to school board members, employees, and students preparing for a teaching career and not to an attorney retained by the school board to act as its solicitor.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Tlumac v. High Bridge Stone, A-69 September Term 2005, SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, July 19, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: For the statutory defense of intoxication to bar recovery for workers' compensation benefits, pursuant to N.J. Stat. Ann. § 34:15-7, the employer was required to show by a preponderance of the evidence that the employee's work-related injuries were caused solely by intoxication.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Wilson v. Hopewell Twp., DOCKET NO. 007429-2005, TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY, July 19, 2006 n1, Decided1 This opinion was originally delivered to the parties in the form of a letter opinion dated July 17, 2006. The opinion was later approved for publication by the Tax Court Committee on Opinions on August 17, 2006 and minor editorial changes have been made to the original opinion.
View this case - free  

Overview: Property used for woodland was deemed to be in agricultural use, pursuant to N.J.S.A. § 54:4-23.3, and a municipality was, therefore, not entitled to impose a rollback assessment for the same on a taxpayer. Other acreage that was left to fallow with no intent of returning the land to an agricultural use was subject to the rollback assessment.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  Copyright© 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.