 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cramer Hill Residents Ass'n v. Primas, DOCKET NO. A-5486-05T3,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, July 17, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Though city could take property by eminent domain under N.J.S.A. § 52:27D-325 without first obtaining certification from New Jersey Council on Affordable Housing agency, remand was required to determine whether there was rational nexus between city's exercise of the power of eminent domain and an increase in the number of affordable housing units.
|
|||||
| Flick v. PMA Ins. Co., DOCKET NO. A-0202-06T1,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, July 17, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The dismissal of plaintiff's complaint for damages based on a workers' compensation third-party administrator's delays and failures to comply with various orders was affirmed as plaintiff failed to exhaust all administrative remedies available before the judge of workers' compensation as set forth in N.J.S.A. § 34:15-28.1 and N.J.A.C. 12:235-3.14.
|
|||||
| In re Hediger, D-40 September Term 2006,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, July 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a disciplinary matter, an attorney was censured for violating N.J. Ct. R. Prof. Conduct 1.3, 1.15(a) and (b), 7.5(d), and 8.1(b) as a result of failing to safekeep a client's property, failing to deliver funds promptly to a third party, failing to cooperate with disciplinary authorities and other reasons.
|
|||||
| In re Hediger, D-124 September Term 2006,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, July 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An attorney was censured and ordered to practice law under supervision for a period of two years due to violating N.J. Ct. R. Prof. Conduct 1.3, 1.4, 1.15(d), 8.1(b), and R. 1:21-6, as a result of lacking diligence in the representation of a client, failing to communicate with a client, committing recordkeeping violations, and other violations.
|
|||||
| New Century Fin. Servs. v. Dennegar, DOCKET NO. A-5403-05T5,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, July 17, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was properly held liable for credit card debt, despite his claims he never applied for or used card, as evidence supported finding that he either expressly applied for card, or authorized his roommate -- to whom he had ceded authority over his finances -- to apply for and use it. Thus, TILA did not limit his liability.
|
|||||
| R.A.C. v. P.J.S., A-5 September Term 2006,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, July 17, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The statute of repose set forth in the New Jersey Parentage Act of 1983, N.J.S.A. § 9:17-45(b), was not subject to the doctrine of equitable tolling, therefore, a father's suit seeking child support reimbursement against the biological father was time-barred since it was brought eight years after the child at issue turned 23 years of age.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
