|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
New Jersey - July 27 - July 30, 2007
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Vineland Constr. Co. v. Township of Pennsauken, DOCKET NO. A-3136-05T2,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, July 27, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: A contest to a master redeveloper's designation to redevelop a company's land was properly dismissed because the company had no constitutional right to redevelop its land, and, once a need for redevelopment was found, the Local Redevelopment and Housing Law, N.J.S.A. §§ 40A:12A-1 to -73, let the township condemn it and appoint a master redeveloper.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Schorpp-Replogle v. New Jersey Mfrs. Ins. Co., DOCKET NO. A-0915-05T2,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, July 30, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: In a workers' compensation appeal, tinnitus was held to qualify as a compensable disability under N.J.S.A. § 34:15-36, provided that the condition was due in a material degree to exposure to harmful noise at the employee's workplace, it materially impaired one's working ability, and was corroborated by objective medical testing.
|
|
| |
|
| |
State v. Elders, A-42 September Term 2006,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, July 30, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: An appellate court erred by reversing a trial court's suppression of evidence seized from defendants' disabled vehicle, which was stopped on the side of a highway, because the officers lacked a reasonable and articulable suspicion, under N.J. Const. art. I, para. 7, that criminal activity would be discovered to have sought a consent to search.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|