|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
New Mexico - February 27 - March 7, 2007
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
N.M. Banquest Investors Corp. v. Peters Corp., Docket No. 25,276,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO, March 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In dispute over fair market value of investors' corporation's shares, trial court's assessment was proper because, under N.M. Stat. Ann. § 53-15-4, findings supported the decision not to add a control premium to the fair value of the group's shares under the circumstances. Moreover, compound interest was properly awarded.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
State ex rel. Children, Youth and Families Dep't v. William M., Docket No. 26,258,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO, March 7, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In a parental rights termination case under N.M. Stat. Ann. § 32A-4-28, a father's right to due process was not denied for failure of the State to provide him with written materials in Spanish because he was represented by an attorney who spoke Spanish, counsel translated parts of the documents for him, and the father had a certified interpreter.
|
|
| |
State v. Trujillo, Docket No. 25,898,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO, March 7, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: District court erred by holding that the State could confine defendant, who had been found mentally retarded, under N.M. Stat. Ann. § 31-9-1.5, because that statute applied only to incompetent and dangerous persons, not to persons who had mental retardation.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|