 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Henning v. Rounds, Docket No. 26,245,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO, August 29, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Tort claims were barred under the New Mexico Tort Claims Act, N.M. Stat. Ann. §§ 41-4-1 to 41-4-27, because the fact that defendants may have had a wrongful motive was simply irrelevant, as long as there was a connection between their actions at the time of the incident and the duties they were requested, required or authorized to perform.
|
|||||
| State v. Pacheco, Docket No. 24,154,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO, August 29, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Intent of prosecutor questions and comments and their impact on the jury was to directly impeach defendant's trial testimony by his post-Miranda silence; the prejudicial impact of the prosecutor's conduct was considerable, given that the evidence against defendant was not overwhelming, and thus there was fundamental error and reversal was required.
|
|||||
| State v. Nash, Docket No. 25,700,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO, September 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment that defendant's sentence for DWI could not be enhanced based on his 1994 DWI conviction was affirmed, because it would be fundamentally unfair to enhance defendant's sentence based on the 1994 constitutionally invalid conviction, when the State did not object to the assertion that the offense occurred on private property.
|
|||||
| State v. Billington, NO. 30,676,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO, October 25, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Frawley, Docket No. 29,011,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO, October 25, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Young, Docket No. 29,467,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO, October 25, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Gonzales, Docket No. 29,623,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO, October 31, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Inquiry Concerning a Judge (Vincent), Docket No. 27,266,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO, November 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
