LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - New York - January 9, 2006

  
Community Hous. Innovations, Inc. v. McKee, SP 5327/05, DISTRICT COURT OF NEW YORK, FIRST DISTRICT, NASSAU COUNTY, January 9, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Cosmopolitan Assoc., L.L.C. v. Fuentes, 2005-758 Q C., SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 9, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Landlord who benefited from tax rebate under New York City, N.Y., Admin. Code § 11-243(k) tax abatement could not refuse to accept a tenant's federal housing subsidy; since he benefited from the low-income housing legislation, he could not avoid the duties it imposed.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Dancesation Enters. of N. Y. Inc. v. Intelecom Solutions Inc., 2005-468 S C., SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 9, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Fox v. Okin, 2005-128 OR C., SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 9, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Garramone v. New York State Racing & Wagering Bd., 117394/05, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK COUNTY, January 9, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Giannini v. Giannini, 05-26053, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, SUFFOLK COUNTY, January 9, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Jennings v. N.Y. City Council, 111597/05, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK COUNTY, January 9, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Matter of Markowitz v. Serio, 404120/04, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK COUNTY, January 9, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: State insurance department superintendent was required to disclose the reports requested by the borough president and could not decline to disclose them based on N.Y. Pub. Off Law § 87(2)(d)'s trade secret exemption; barring disclosure of the records would thwart regulatory law aimed at curbing illegal practice of "redlining."

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Oppenheim v. Village of Great Neck Plaza, Inc., 8726/05, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, NASSAU COUNTY, January 9, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Bezjak, 2005NY011706, CRIMINAL COURT OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK COUNTY, January 9, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Since New York City, New York's parade permit scheme, New York City, N.Y., Admin. Code § 10-110 and New York City, N.Y., R. tit. 38, § 19-01 et seq., was overbroad, it was unconstitutional on its face; nevertheless, defendants were in violation of N.Y. Penal Law § 240.20(5) for disorderly conduct by participating in a Critical Mass bicycle parade.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.