LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - New York - January 16, 2007

  
Matter of R & V Dev., LLC v. Town of Islip, Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 2006-01707, (Index No. 6328-05), SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 16, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Matter of Rizzo, 2006-08329, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 16, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4), based on a lawyer's felony conviction of scheme to defraud in the first degree, the lawyer was disbarred.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Matter of Rocky Point Realty, LLC v. Town of Brookhaven, 2005-08059, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 16, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Town's authorization of condemnation was confirmed because notice of public hearing identified property affected, as N.Y. Em. Dom. Proc. Law § 202(A) required; proposed condemnation was rationally related to public purpose, as N.Y. Em. Dom. Proc. Law § 207(C) required; proceeding complied with State Environmental Quality Review Act requirements.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Matter of Staib v. Staib, 2006-03690, (Index No. 18493/04), SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 16, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Matter of Subrina A. v. Tallac A., 2006-02931, (Docket Nos. N-05902-04, N-05903-04, N-05904-04), SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 16, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Matter of Zhang v. Zhu, 2005-11735, (Docket No. O-4934/05), SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 16, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Merchants Bank of N.Y. v. Gross, 9762, Index 121783/03, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 16, 2007, Decided , January 16, 2007, Entered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Moss v. Moss, 2005-08980, (Index No. 201101/03), SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 16, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Nason v. Fisher, 9823, Index 108120/02, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 16, 2007, Decided , January 16, 2007, Entered
View this case - free  

Overview: Although there were triable issues of fact with respect to a client's cause of action for constructive fraud and overbilling, a client's claims for false representation under Judiciary Law § 487, malpractice, and false imprisonment were deficient; therefore, the trial court properly granted the attorneys' cross-motion for summary judgment.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Nelson v. Bestway Coach Express, 9830, Index 7902/04, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 16, 2007, Decided , January 16, 2007, Entered
View this case - free  

Overview: Because a passenger was entitled to an initial opportunity to develop the record regarding the factual basis of the defendants' reliance on the emergency doctrine, and had a reasonable excuse for her inability to carry her burden on summary judgment under CPLR 3212(f), the motion court erred in granting a bus company's motion for summary judgment.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.