Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - New York - January 10, 2006
	State Ins. Fund v. Utica First Ins. Co., 7544 Index 601539/00, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 10, 2006, Decided , January 10, 2006, Entered View this case - free   Overview: Since insurance company's disclaimer provided two separate bases for denying coverage and the insurance company never sought to change its position to rely on ground not set forth in disclaimer, its reliance on employee exclusion was never waived. Insurance company was not required to send separate notice to party that actually sued the insured. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Terlizzese v. Robinson's Custom Serv., Inc., 2005-02118, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 10, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Torres v. Safety Cab Corp., 2005-00134, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 10, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Tortorella v. A.C. & S., Inc., 7130, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 10, 2006, Decided , January 10, 2006, Entered View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Vail v. KMart Corp., 2001-05997, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 10, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Because a proffered expert's testimony that the manufacturers and sellers had a duty to warn of a garment's flammability characteristics, if admitted, would have been sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact, the trial court erred in precluding the testimony. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us   Copyright© 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.