|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
New York - January 10, 2006
|
| |
Burrowes v. Combs, 6654-6655,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 10, 2006, Decided , January 10, 2006, Entered
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because a business associate's claims were either barred by N.Y. C.P.L.R. §§ 213, 214(3), or were not in writing signed by the associate, as required by N.Y. Gen. Oblig. Law § 17-101, and the tortious interference claim was barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel and failed to set forth the necessary allegations, they were dismissed.
|
|
| |
Campagna v. Arleo, 2003-04086,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 10, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because police officers had probable cause to believe that the guests committed a crime, the guests' proposed allegations were insufficient to state causes of action for false arrest, false imprisonment, or the use of excessive force; the officers were entitled to summary judgment on their claim for damages under N.Y. Gen. Mun. Law § 205-e.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Edge Mgt. Consulting, Inc. v. Blank, 6013-6014,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 10, 2006, Decided , January 10, 2006, Entered
View this case - free
|
Overview: Although it was an intended third-party beneficiary to a contract, because a lessor did not maintain its premises in good repair under N.Y. Mult. Dwell. Law § 78, New York City, N.Y., Admin. Code § 27-2005, N.Y. Real Prop. Law § 235-b, it could not obtain common-law indemnification from the renovators or contractual indemnification from a neighbor.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Frost Line Refrigeration, Inc. v. Gastwirth, Mirsky & Stein, LLP, 2005-03137,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 10, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
