 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| People v. Nowinski, 16574,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, THIRD DEPARTMENT, January 18, 2007, Decided , January 18, 2007, Entered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for course of sexual conduct under Penal Law § 130.75(1)(b) was supported by sufficient evidence because the minor victim's testimony established that, on two or more occasions, defendant subjected her to sexual intercourse at his home when the victim was twelve years old.
|
|||||
| People v. Quintana, 27, Ind. 4418/05,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 18, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Perlin v. King, 9865, Index 116748/03,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 18, 2007, Decided , January 18, 2007, Entered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Expert testimony established that a dentist committed dental malpractice by failing to diagnose and treat a patient's congenital tooth and jawbone disorders, and ankylosis and anodontia and consequential gaps in the teeth. Testimony further established that the patient's pain and suffering could have been alleviated by available oral devices.
|
|||||
| Reich v. Reich, 30N, Index 350720/03,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 18, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Travelers Indem. Co. v. Commerce & Industry Ins. Co. of Can., 501178,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, THIRD DEPARTMENT, January 18, 2007, Decided , January 18, 2007, Entered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a "declarations extension" in an insurance policy specifically listed an owner as an additional insured, and because an employee's accident occurred while the employer was performing operations for the owner, the trial court properly granted summary judgment to the owner after finding that coverage was afforded under the policy endorsement.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
