 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| People v. Semprit-Carmona, 2004-07117 (Ind. No. 622/03),
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Smith, 2005-02626 (Ind. No. 3611/04),
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Stover, 2002-07302 (Ind. No. 00-01632),
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sua sponte exclusion of certain of defendant's family and friends from courtroom for part of one witness's cross-examination was not improper. The very limited exclusion was justified in consideration of overriding interests of that witness's security and his reluctance to testify in the presence of defendant's family and friends.
|
|||||
| People v. Ware, 2004-03364 (Ind. No. 3304/03),
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defense of justification was disproved beyond a reasonable doubt; there was sufficient evidence that defendant was the initial aggressor, the victim was fleeing and unarmed, and defendant could have retreated to safety without resorting to deadly physical force. Defendant's convictions had to be sustained.
|
|||||
| People v. Williams, 2004-04110 (Ind. No. 03-00062),
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Woods, 7, Ind. 8213/99,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 23, 2007, Decided , January 23, 2007, Entered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Puma v. City of New York, 9992, Index 16147/01,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 23, 2007, Decided , January 23, 2007, Entered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Quality King Distribs., Inc. v. E & M ESR, Inc., 2005-08659, (Index No. 10632/03),
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the first distributor was not a third-party beneficiary of an indemnity agreement between the second distributor and a pharmacy, and because the second distributor had no obligation to defend or indemnify the pharmacy in another action, the trial court properly granted summary judgment to the second distributor.
|
|||||
| Reid v. City of New York, 2006-00196, (Index No. 45957/03),
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an action for plaintiff's injuries when she tripped and fell as a result of the uneven height differential between the landing of a subway entrance staircase and the adjoining sidewalk, the trial court improperly granted a transit authority summary judgment; an expert's affidavit was insufficient to show that the authority was not liable.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
