LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - New York - January 12, 2006

  
People v. Salgado, 6017 Ind. 1451/02, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 12, 2006, Decided , January 12, 2006, Entered
View this case - free  

Overview: Because nothing in N.Y. Crim. Proc. Law § 470.15(1) limited appellate review of defendant's claim of a speedy trial violation to only those portions of the ruling that held certain periods of time chargeable to the People, the trial court properly granted defendant's N.Y. Crim. Proc. Law § 30.30 motion to dismiss the indictment.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Santana, 7549 Ind. 3292/00, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 12, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Simms, 7566, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 12, 2006, Decided , January 12, 2006, Entered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Soba, 7568, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 12, 2006, Decided , January 12, 2006, Entered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Spady, 15505, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, THIRD DEPARTMENT, January 12, 2006, Decided , January 12, 2006, Entered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Strafer, 2005KN045680, CRIMINAL COURT OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, KINGS COUNTY, January 12, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Swackhammer, 96898, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, THIRD DEPARTMENT, January 12, 2006, Decided , January 12, 2006, Entered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Thomas, 15397, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, THIRD DEPARTMENT, January 12, 2006, Decided , January 12, 2006, Entered
View this case - free  

Overview: Vague claims that defendant was pressured by the "whole court system" into pleading guilty did not mandate allowing withdrawal where record indicated plea was knowing and voluntary. Since defendant could have received sentence longer than one year for prior felony, sentencing under N.Y. Penal Law § 70.06(6)(a) was proper.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Tucker, 7558 Ind. 5620/02, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 12, 2006, Decided , January 12, 2006, Entered
View this case - free  

Overview: In defendant's robbery prosecution, testimony regarding a showup procedure was properly admitted. Even if the testimony had been inadmissible, harmless error existed based on overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilt, including his voluntary confession as well as physical evidence.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Tzitzikalakis, 6523 Ind. 7706/02, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 12, 2006, Decided , January 12, 2006, Entered
View this case - free  

Overview: Because a trial court improperly relieved the People of their burden of proving actual out-of-pocket loss and precluded defendant from introducing evidence of the fair market value of the goods and services, it violated N.Y. Penal Law § 60.27 and N.Y. Crim. Proc. Law § 400.30; therefore, defendant was entitled to a new restitution hearing.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.