LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - New York - January 23, 2007

  
People v. Lopez, 1997-02287, (Ind. No. 1394/96), SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Lopez, 2003-01270 (Ind. No. 9371/00), SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Morris, 2004-11104, (Ind. No. 10194/04), SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Muhammad, 2005-02406, (Ind. No. 10412/04), SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Ochoa, 2005-07543, (Ind. No. 8067/03), SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Patterson, 2005-04831, 2005-04829, (Ind. Nos. 04-00801, 05-00186), SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Pedro, 2002-02519, (Ind. No. 91/00), SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's conviction of scheme to defraud in the first degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree, criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, and petit larceny were affirmed. Evidence was sufficient to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15(5)).

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Prince, 2004-10429 (Ind. No. 811/01), SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: An alleged error that the prosecutor in closing argument improperly vouched for the credibility of the People's witnesses with a remark that witnesses could not have been mistaken in their identification of defendant was alleviated as the trial court sustained defendant's objections and provided curative jury instructions.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Quinitchette, 2005-04756, 2005-05333, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Ramkissoon, 2004-07403 (Ind. No. 2124/02), SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: While a defendant was entitled to present inconsistent defenses, counsel's choice not to do so in this case was part of a reasonable and legitimate strategy. Defendant did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel by virtue of counsel's decision to request a duress charge on some of the counts, but not all of them.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  Copyright© 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.