LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - New York - January 17, 2006

  
Dorvil v. Hilton Hotels Corp., 7590, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 17, 2006, Decided , January 17, 2006, Entered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Evans v. Craig, 2004-08205, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Haberman v. City of Long Beach, 2004-05668, Index No. 002715/00, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Haberman v. City of Long Beach, 2005-02529, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Hall v. Barist El. Co., 2004-09921, Index No. 13612/00, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Even though an elevator company established, prima facie, that it had no actual or constructive notice of a defective condition on an elevator that would cause it to accelerate and hit something, or stop and rumble or vibrate prior to the incident, plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact regarding notice of such a defective condition.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Han v. Bark, 2005-01330, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Hayes v. Wilson, 2004-09558, 2005-01054, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Antoine P. (Anonymous), 2005-04404, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: The evidence was legally sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that a juvenile committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of assault in the third degree and attempted assault in the third degree. The findings of fact were not against the weight of the evidence.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Carlton F. (Anonymous), 2004-01291, 2004-01292, 2005-06031, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Officer reasonably believed juvenile was over 16 and had probable cause to arrest for disorderly conduct, so resisting arrest finding under N.Y. Penal Law § 205.30 was supported; evidence showed juvenile had larcenous intent and knew merchandise was stolen to support larceny and possession of stolen property under N.Y. Penal Law §§ 155.25, 165.40.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Qwasan M. (Anonymous), 2004-07145, 2004-08051, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.