|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
New York - January 17, 2006
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Pedreira v. Pedreira, 7604N Index 350700/00,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 17, 2006, Decided , January 17, 2006, Entered
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
People of the State of New York ex rel. Fred Foster v. New York State Div. of Parole, 7603, Index 402784/04,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 17, 2006, Decided , January 17, 2006, Entered
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
People v. Carrington, 7585, Ind. 7175/00,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 17, 2006, Decided , January 17, 2006, Entered
View this case - free
|
Overview: The trial court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress physical evidence and statements, as the record established that his girlfriend voluntarily consented to police and parole officers' entry into the apartment she shared with defendant and to a search under the mattress of her bed, which yielded incriminating evidence.
|
|
| |
|
| |
People v. Garcia, 2003-08084, Ind. No. 03-476,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Defendant's sentencing court was silent on the issue of whether an indeterminate sentence imposed should run consecutively or concurrently with a prior, probation violation sentence. Accordingly, by operation of law, and in light of the People's concession that the two sentences "necessarily merged," the sentences had to run concurrently.
|
|
| |
|
| |
People v. Goodson, 7600,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 17, 2006, Decided , January 17, 2006, Entered
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
