|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
New York - January 30, 2007
|
| |
Matter of Donnell W., 2006-05997, (Docket No. D-11308-06),
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 30, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Based, inter alia, upon the serious nature of a juvenile's criminal possession of a weapon, and a psychologist's recommendation, the family court properly found that the least restrictive dispositional alternative was a nonsecure facility for a period of 12 months with credit for time spent in detention under Family Ct Act § 352.2(2)(a).
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Matter of Higgs v. Hernandez, 69, Index 402973/05,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 30, 2007, Decided , January 30, 2007, Entered
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Matter of Ingraham v. Planning Bd. of Town of Southeast, 2004-11084, (Index No. 4026/04),
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 30, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Planning board decision conditionally granting an application for approval of a final subdivision plat was annulled because, while board indicated that it had taken requisite hard look at environmental impact of project necessary to prepare State Environmental Quality Review Act determination, court had annulled that determination in prior appeal.
|
|
| |
Matter of Jorbel v. Thanning, 2006-03611, (Index No. 1190/05),
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 30, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because the actions taken by a father did not toll the statute of limitations in CPLR 217(1) or transform an amended death certificate into a non-final determination, the father's CPLR art. 78 proceeding, which was commenced more than four months after the official filing of the amended death certificate, was time barred.
|
|
| |
Matter of Joshua Wilson A. v. Joseph Wilson A., 71,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 30, 2007, Decided , January 30, 2007, Entered
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Matter of Kainth v. Kainth, 2005-07639, 2005-07640, 2005-07641, (Docket No. F-1506-00-05),
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 30, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: A father had not willfully violated a child support order. The evidence in a proceeding under Family Ct Act art. 4 showed that the father's income was insufficient to permit payments in accordance with the support order, that the father's loss of higher paying employment was not self-imposed, and that the father actively pursued similar employment.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
