|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
New York - January 17, 2006
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
People v. Sherwood, 7601,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 17, 2006, Decided , January 17, 2006, Entered
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
People v. Woolridge, 7588, Ind. 5285/97,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 17, 2006, Decided , January 17, 2006, Entered
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Rafaelova v. City of New York, 7589,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 17, 2006, Decided , January 17, 2006, Entered
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Richter v. Davidson & Cohen, P.C., 2004-05729, Index No. 10115/04,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: An order denying defendants' motion to dismiss in an action, inter alia, for legal malpractice, was affirmed, as the trial court correctly determined that the client was not collaterally estopped from raising the issue of whether defendants had actual authority to settle his underlying personal injury case.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Seaman v. Wyckoff Hgts. Med. Ctr., Inc., 2005-03542,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: In an action for violation of N.Y. Lab. Law § 740, trial court providently exercised its discretion in issuing a protective order pursuant to N.Y. C.P.L.R. 3103, and providently exercised its discretion in granting that branch of the corporation's oral application which was to impose sanctions under N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22, § 130-1.1.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
