|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
New York - February 2, 2007
|
| |
|
| |
Matter of Zachary R.F., 58 CAF 06-03196,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Entered
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Matter of Zachary R.F., 57 CAF 06-03194,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Entered
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Matter of Zankowski, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Mills v. Raycom Media, Inc., MOTION NO. (1396/06), CA 06-00597.,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Moody v. Sorokina, 1657 CA 05-00722,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Entered
View this case - free
|
Overview: Defendant wife was entitled to seek enforcement of a federal affidavit of support; the form I-864 affidavit was a legally enforceable contract, and pursuant to 8 U.S.C.S. § 1183a(e)(1), the wife, a sponsored immigrant, had independent standing to enforce the sponsor's obligation in any federal or state court.
|
|
| |
Moody v. Sorokina, 1658 CA 05-01001,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Entered
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Moore v. Gawel, 1463 CA 06-01795,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Entered
View this case - free
|
Overview: Trial court improperly found that a passenger involved in an automobile accident provided insufficient medical evidence to avoid summary judgment as to permanence of his alleged injuries within Insurance Law § 5102(d)'s meaning, but properly found that he did not raise a triable issue of fact as to whether his injuries were in 90/180 category.
|
|
| |
National Bank of Geneva v. Case Credit Corp., 1528 CA 06-00324,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Entered
View this case - free
|
Overview: The bank's conversion claim against the secured creditors failed because the secured creditors did not exercise dominion and control over the proceeds of the original equipment which was traded in for new equipment; the equipment owners received the proceeds by way of a discount from the supplier on the new equipment.
|
|
| |
National Bank of Geneva v. Case Credit Corp., 1530 CA 06-00326,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Entered
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
