|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
New York - February 2, 2007
|
| |
People v. Edsall, 118 KA 06-00053,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Entered
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
People v. Ellis, 71 KA 05-01811,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Entered
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
People v. Frank, 9 KA 05-02591,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Entered
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
People v. Gardner, 48 KA 06-00130,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Entered
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
People v. Gates, 96 KA 05-02502,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Entered
View this case - free
|
Overview: Evidence was legally sufficient to support defendant's conviction of third-degree criminal weapon possession under Penal Law § 265.02(4) because, after seeing defendant place something on the ground, police immediately recovered a loaded weapon from the area. These circumstances supported the jury's finding that defendant possessed a loaded weapon.
|
|
| |
People v. Gentile, KA 04-02001.,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
People v. Glinski, 1607 KA 05-00536,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Entered
View this case - free
|
Overview: It was error to provide that definite sentence for criminal contempt under Penal Code § 215.51(b)(vi) was to be served consecutively to defendant's determinate sentence for criminal weapon possession under Penal Law § 265.02 because contempt offense was committed before determinate sentence was imposed, so definite sentence had to run concurrently.
|
|
| |
People v. Glinski, 1606 KA 05-01477,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Entered
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
People v. Green, 50 KA 03-02370,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Entered
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
People v. Green, 178 KA 06-00667,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Entered
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
