|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
New York - February 2, 2007
|
| |
Campbell v. Aero. Prods. Intl., 238 CA 06-02573,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Entered
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Campbell v. Aerospace Prods. Intl., 237 CA 06-02572,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Entered
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Carson v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 23 CA 06-02455,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Entered
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
City of Niagara Falls v. Merchants Ins. Group, MOTION NO. (1262/06) CA 06-01146.,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
City of Rome v. Verizon N. Y., Inc., MOTION NO. (1284/06) CA 06-01555.,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Cliffstar Corp. v. Cape Cod Biolab Corp., 60 CA 06-01851,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Entered
View this case - free
|
Overview: Summary judgment was properly granted to seller in contract dispute based on buyer's failure to pay for cranberry concentrate because buyer's rejection of concentrate, approximately one year after delivery and approximately five months after seller filed its lawsuit did not occur within reasonable time period under UCC 2-602(1), 2-606(1)(b).
|
|
| |
Daniels v. DePasquale, 195 CA 06-01710,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Entered
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Daniels v. DePasquale, 196 CA 06-02081,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Entered
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Davis v. McCullough, 145 CA 06-00362,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Entered
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
De Angelis v. Protopopescu, 1557 CA 06-00742,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Entered
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|