LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - New York - February 2, 2007

  
Matter of Cellino, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Matter of Coursen v. Planning Bd. of Town of Pompey, 1465 CA 06-01408, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Entered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Matter of Courtney L.P. v. Andrew S.P., MOTION NO. (1422/06), CAF 05-02841., SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Matter of Cunningham, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Court determined that attorney should be censured because, while she violated numerous disciplinary rules, including neglect of client matters, and Judiciary Law § 468-a and 22 NYCRR 118.1 by failing to comply with attorney registration requirements, she submitted mitigating evidence that she suffered from episodic depression at time of misconduct.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Matter of Daniel M., 120 CAF 06-02861, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Entered
View this case - free  

Overview: Petition and statements in delinquency proceeding were sufficient to charge third degree menacing, Penal Law § 120.15, under circumstances in which they alleged that an officer was placed in fear of physical injury as result of conduct of respondent in grabbing officer's flashlight and raising it above his head as if to strike the officer.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Matter of Davis v. Selsky, 91 TP 06-02199, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Entered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Matter of Devon B. v. Angie Y., 143 CAF 05-02183, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Entered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Matter of Devon B. v. Angie Y., 142 CAF 05-01113, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Entered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Matter of Engel, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Lawyer was censured for misconduct in violation of, inter alia, 22 NYCRR 1200.3, in which he subjected a client to inappropriate physical contact, neglected client matters, used retainer agreements in matrimonial matters that failed to include required information, and failed to provide billing statements at required intervals.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Matter of Eric S.D., 12 CAF 06-01549, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Entered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.