|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
New York - February 2, 2007
|
| |
Matter of Eric S.D., 11 CAF 06-01547,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Entered
View this case - free
|
Overview: Trial court properly found that juvenile respondent's placement with the state office of children and family services was the least restrictive placement alternative consistent with respondent's best interests and the need for protection of the community pursuant to Family Ct Act § 352.2(2)(a). Prior placements in foster homes had failed.
|
|
| |
Matter of Georgiadis v. McGurn, 185 CA 06-00908,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Entered
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Matter of Gourdine v. Goord, 1 TP 06-02344,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Entered
View this case - free
|
Overview: Determination that prisoner violated 7 NYCRR 270.2(B)(5)(ii) by engaging in violent conduct was modified and his CPLR art. 78 petition to annul determination finding that he violated that rule was granted because, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services conceded, substantial evidence did not support determination.
|
|
| |
Matter of Helen L.O. v. Mark L.O., 1613 CAF 05-01003,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Entered
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Matter of Herkimer, MOTION NO. (1353/06) CA 05-01216,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Matter of Hizbullahankhamon v. Goord, 235 CA 05-02791,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Entered
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Matter of Jacqueline B. v. Norman E.G., 180 CAF 05-00821,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Entered
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Matter of Jacqueline B. v. Norman E.G., 184 CAF 05-02736,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Entered
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Matter of Jayson, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where respondent attorney accepted representation of a client when he knew or should have known that he was unable to provide meaningful representation but was suffering from severe health problems at the time, the court determined that a suspension of 18 months was appropriate.
|
|
| |
Matter of Kalifa K. v. Stephen K., 1570 CAF 05-01955,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Entered
View this case - free
|
Overview: Adjudication that father sexually abused his daughter was error. There was no corroborating evidence of daughter's unsworn out-of-court statements of abuse pursuant to Family Ct Act § 1046(a)(vi). None of department's witnesses testified as experts in child sexual abuse, and none discussed symptoms commonly seen in victims.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
