Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - New York - January 24, 2006
	Farmer v. City of New York, 2004-01973, 2004-09418, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 24, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Feola v. Carroll, 2004-09356 (Index No. 5935/04), SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 24, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Since violation of N.Y. Penal Law § 260.10(1) did not always indicate a lack of moral integrity, a police officer could not be summarily dismissed under N.Y. Pub. Off. § 30(1)(e) for such a misdemeanor offense; a due process hearing under N.Y. Civ. Serv. Law § 75 was required before adverse action could be taken. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Fontaine v. Matthews, 7654-7654A, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 24, 2006, Decided , January 24, 2006, Entered View this case - free   Overview: A judgment and award in favor of a client in a legal malpractice action was affirmed; the client's attorney did not appear at trial after suffering a stroke, and co-counsel's unpreparedness with respect to the medical aspects of the underlying case was a substantial factor for a no-damages verdict. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Gainey v. Anorzej, 2004-10177 (Index No. 23742/01), SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 24, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Where defendant failed to show reasonable excusable neglect for his failure to appear or answer a complaint, and he did not deny that he had notice of a motion for leave to enter judgment due to defendant's default, his motion more than two years later to vacate the default pursuant to N.Y. C.P.L.R. 5015(a)(1) should have been denied. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Gluck v. Fantastic, Inc., 2004-07904, 2005-00466, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 24, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Gonzalez v. Jamaica Hosp., 2004-06482 Index No. 9025/99, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 24, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Gray v. Macy's E., Inc., 7651 Index 104607/02, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 24, 2006, Decided , January 24, 2006, Entered View this case - free   Overview: A former employee's causes of action, arising out of the termination of her employment and escort from the former employer's premises by its security guards, were properly dismissed as barred by the exclusivity provisions of the Workers' Compensation Law (N.Y. Workers' Comp. Law §§ 11, 29(6)). The guards' presence was appropriate. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Grimes v. Ward, 570847/05, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 24, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Gruppo v. London, 7664, Index 106336/02 105847/04 590478/05, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 24, 2006, Decided , January 24, 2006, Entered View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Handlovic v. Bedford Park Dev., 2004-09586 (Index Nos. 5952/03, 76105/03), SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 24, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Overview: A trial court erred in granting summary judgment to a worker on the issue of liability on claims against a premises owner and contractor, alleging violations of N.Y. Lab. Law §§ 200, 241(6), and 240(1), as the worker did not raise triable issues of fact after the owner and contractor established their prima facie entitlement to summary judgment. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us   CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.