|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
New York - January 24, 2006
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Matter of Mendez v. Doar, 7660, Index 401148/04,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 24, 2006, Decided , January 24, 2006, Entered
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Matter of Norman, 2005-09739 (Attorney Registration No. 1299056),
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: An attorney was found guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree, in violation of N.Y. Penal Law § 175.10, and violating N.Y. Elec. Law § 14-126(4). By virtue of his conviction of a felony, the attorney was automatically disbarred and ceased to be an attorney pursuant to N.Y. Jud. Ct. Acts Law § 90(4)(a).
|
|
| |
Matter of Smalls v. New York City Hous. Auth., 6968 Index 400833/04,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 24, 2006, Decided , January 24, 2006, Entered
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Matter of State-Wide Ins. Co. v. Womble, 2005-06781 (Index No. 11608/05),
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: As an insurer had ample time (17 months) to seek discovery before commencing a proceeding to permanently stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim and unjustifiably failed to do so, the trial court erred in its order, in effect, granting the petition.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|