 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| 4966 Broadway Realty Corp. v. De La Rosa, 570894/05,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 26, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Arbor Secured Funding, Inc. v. Just Assets NY 1, 012550/2004,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, NASSAU COUNTY, January 26, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Brenowitz v. North Shore Univ. Hosp., 10090/03,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, RICHMOND COUNTY, January 26, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| CIBC Mellon Trust Co. v. Samuel Montagu & Co. Ltd., 7677, Index 602825/03,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 26, 2006, Decided , January 26, 2006, Entered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Chase Manhattan Bank v. New Hampshire Ins. Co., 7215, Ind. 600996/00, 590308/01,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 26, 2006, Decided , January 26, 2006, Entered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Questions of fact as to when film project that gave rise to the parties' insurance contract was actually delivered precluded entry of summary judgment in favor of either party.
|
|||||
| Chuang Ying Mo v. Liu, 570683/05,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 26, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| David W. v. State of New York, 2004-08544 (Claim No. 106125),
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 26, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court dismissed an individual's claim for unjust conviction and imprisonment pursuant to N.Y. Ct. Cl. Act § 8-b, where the individual demonstrated merely that his designation as a repeat risk level three sex offender was calculated in violation of his due process rights.
|
|||||
| Davis v. Melnicke, 7708N- 7708NA Index 108916/05,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 26, 2006, Decided , January 26, 2006, Entered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Doyle v. Hafner, 10154/04,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, RICHMOND COUNTY, January 26, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A neighbor improperly filed a notice of pendency against a landowner's property because she made no claim of right to his land and their dispute was limited to encroachment on her land. The landowner's evidence that the disputed area had been used continuously by owners of his property for 40 years was sufficient to establish adverse possession.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
