|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
New York - January 26, 2006
|
| |
Matter of Baez v. Dennison, 98543,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, THIRD DEPARTMENT, January 26, 2006, Decided , January 26, 2006, Entered
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Matter of Brady v. Schermerhorn, 97214,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, THIRD DEPARTMENT, January 26, 2006, Decided , January 26, 2006, Entered
View this case - free
|
Overview: Granting a father's application, in proceedings pursuant to N.Y. Fam. Ct. Act art. 6, to modify a prior order of custody was affirmed; the father established a substantial change in circumstances and there was a sound basis for awarding him physical custody, due to the mother's use of marijuana and poor choice of babysitters for the child.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Matter of Cadejah AA. v. Alta. CC., 16061,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, THIRD DEPARTMENT, January 26, 2006, Decided , January 26, 2006, Entered
View this case - free
|
Overview: Family court properly determined that a mother had neglected her children pursuant to N.Y. Fam. Ct. Act § 1012(f)(i)(b), as the mother violated a protective order by allowing the father to come to the family home while the parties' daughter was present and failed to arrange for alternate living arrangements for the daughter.
|
|
| |
Matter of Coombs v. New York State Div. of Parole, 98540,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, THIRD DEPARTMENT, January 26, 2006, Decided , January 26, 2006, Entered
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Matter of Daniel C. v. Connie D., 97854,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, THIRD DEPARTMENT, January 26, 2006, Decided , January 26, 2006, Entered
View this case - free
|
Overview: There was a sound and substantial basis in the record for the trial court's conclusion that awarding custody to a child's aunt would not be in the child's best interest, as the aunt and her live-in boyfriend were both unemployed, disabled, and unable to lift more than 15-20 pounds, and the aunt's home was found to be dirty and unkept.
|
|
| |
Matter of Daniella C.G. v. Frank G., 7680- 7681,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 26, 2006, Decided , January 26, 2006, Entered
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Matter of Daniul v. Commissioner of Labor, 98770,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, THIRD DEPARTMENT, January 26, 2006, Decided , January 26, 2006, Entered
View this case - free
|
Overview: The New York Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board properly denied benefits to a claimant, as the employer's request that she attend a meeting was reasonable and the claimant's fear of discharge did not constitute a good reason for her failure to attend the meeting.
|
|
| |
Matter of Faulkner v. New York State Div. of Parole, 98055,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, THIRD DEPARTMENT, January 26, 2006, Decided , January 26, 2006, Entered
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
