Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - New York - January 31, 2006
	People v. Ortiz, 2004-01007, Ind. No. 5899/02, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 31, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Failure to turn over witness's statement was not Brady violation requiring reversal where statement was merely cumulative of other defense evidence; protective order imposed at sentencing should have been adjusted, under N.Y. Crim. Proc. Law § 530.13(4), to reflect defendant's jail-time credit. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	People v. Pagan, 2003-05017, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 31, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	People v. Sherman, 2003-05982, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 31, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Overview: No appeal lay from the dismissal of an indictment as expressed in a "motion buck sheet" pursuant to N.Y. Crim. Proc. Law § 450.20(1-a); there was nothing in it which would indicate that it was intended to be a court order, and the notation on the motion buck sheet suggested that even the trial court did not consider it to be a court order. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	People v. Tyrell, 2209/04, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK COUNTY, January 31, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	People v. Ulysse, 2003-03313, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 31, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	People v. Walker, 7710 Ind. 3507/01, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 31, 2006, Decided , January 31, 2006, Entered View this case - free   Overview: Police had probable cause to arrest defendant based on inculpatory statements made to police by other participants in the criminal incidents that inculpated defendant as well as themselves. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Perez v. City of New York, 2005-03250, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 31, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Perez v. Rodriguez, 6011, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, January 31, 2006, Decided , January 31, 2006, Entered View this case - free   Overview: Appellate court reversed the denial of a driver's summary judgment motion because the driver proved that plaintiff had not suffered a serious injury as defined by N.Y. Ins. Law § 5102(d) as plaintiff provided no objective evidence of an injury and could not explain the gap in treatment of three and one-half years following the accident. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Pina v. Flik Intl. Corp., 2005-01804, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 31, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Ramos v. Castega-20 Vesey St., LLC, 2004-09276, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, January 31, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Because a stairway spill was virtually contemporaneous with a delivery man's fall and because he did not prove that a delicatessen's employee or agent negligently caused the delivery man's injuries, the trial court correctly granted the delicatessen's N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 4404(a) motion to set aside the verdict and for judgment as a matter of law. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us   CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.