LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - North Carolina - January 2, 2007

  
Three Rivers Valle, LLC v. Grove Park Inn Resort, Inc., NO. COA05-1427, COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, January 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Wash. Mut. Bank v. Hargrove, NO. COA06-409, COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, January 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Williams v. Vonderau, NO. COA05-1549, COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, January 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Appellate court concluded first neighbor's appeal of civil no-contact order issued pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 50C-8(c) was moot; appellate court was powerless to review the validity of the civil no-contact order, as case was not calendered for hearing before the appellate court until more than five months after it had ceased to be effective.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Womack Newspapers, Inc. v. Town of Kitty Hawk, NO. COA05-1650, COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, January 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court's holding that documents that the newspaper sought were public records that had to be produced, with limited exceptions, was not error despite town's claim that documents were not public records because town did not possess them; law firm that did possess them was a public officer pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 132-1(a).

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.