 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re A.V. , NO. COA06-535,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, January 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re B.R.H., NO. COA06-606,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, January 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Brown, NO. COA06-399,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, January 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re C.C.L., NO. COA06-462,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, January 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re D.J.M., NO. COA06-397,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, January 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a juvenile's court supervision was revoked for probation violations, the trial court did not err by failing to make the specific inquiries enumerated in N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-2407 because § 7B-2407 did not apply to the juvenile's admission, or by the juvenile through his attorney, that the juvenile violated conditions of court supervision.
|
|||||
| In re D.R.S., No. COA06-504,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, January 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-1102(b) (2005) merely directed the Department of Social Services (DSS) to serve the motion and notice pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, N.C. R. Civ. P. 4, and nowhere suggested that the DSS had to issue a summons instead of or in addition to those documents, there was violation because of a failure to issue a summons.
|
|||||
| In re Da.A, NO. COA06-273,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, January 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re J.D.F., NO. COA06-423,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, January 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re J.D.T., NO. COA06-245,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, January 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
