 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| May v. Down East Homes of Beulaville, Inc., NO. COA05-547,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, January 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A mobile homeowner's failure to provide any basis for his exceptions to a trial court's dismissal of his action against a contractor was a violation of N.C. R. App. P. 10 and required dismissal of the appeal for failure to preserve any issues.
|
|||||
| Midland Fire Prot., Inc. v. Clancy & Theys Constr. Co., NO. COA05-214,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, January 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Patronelli v. Patronelli, NO. COA04-1666,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, January 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the wife received pro bono counsel during the alimony proceedings, the wife was not entitled to an award of counsel fees under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 50-16.4 (2003). Counsel fees referred only to fees paid by the wife to counsel for services rendered, and no such payment was made in the instant case.
|
|||||
| Perry v. United States Assemblies, NO. COA05-83,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, January 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Pineville Forest Homeowners Ass'n v. Portrait Homes Constr. Co., NO. COA05-365,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, January 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since the trial court did not certify the order as immediately appealable pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, N.C. R. Civ. P. 54, and the construction company did not appear to be deprived of any substantial right which could not be protected by timely appeal from the ultimate disposition of the controversy on its merits, the appeal was dismissed.
|
|||||
| Qui Ngo v. Park, NO. COA04-847,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, January 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ramirez v. Golden Corral, COA 05-587,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, January 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ramirez v. Golden Corral, NO. COA05-587,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, January 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Reep v. Beck, NO. COA03-961-2,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, January 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
