 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Frost v. Salter Path Fire & Rescue, No. 181A06,
SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA, January 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court erred in finding employee suffered a compensable injury resulting in temporary total disability; employee's injury from having her go-cart collide with another go-cart at a voluntary, employer-arranged "Fun Day" was not an injury that arose out of employment of the employee pursuant to relevant statute, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-2(6).
|
|||||
| Magnolia Mfg. of N.C., Inc. v. Erie Ins. Exch., No. 525A06,
SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA, January 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ripellino v. N.C. Sch. Bds. Ass'n, No. 180A06,
SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA, January 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Robins v. Town of Hillsborough, No. 154A06,
SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA, January 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Applicant was entitled to have his application for approval of his site plan reviewed under the ordinances and procedural rules in effect as of the time he filed his application, and since the town did not apply ordinance as it existed before passage of moratorium and ordinance amendment, further proceedings on his application were necessary.
|
|||||
| State v. Ellis, No. 638PA04,
SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA, January 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When defendant entered a guilty plea on a charge of armed robbery, former N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-87(d) required that an armed robbery prison term run consecutively with and commence at expiration of any other sentence being served by the offender. A concurrent sentence for this offense was illegal and should have been vacated.
|
|||||
| State v. Everett, No. 350A06,
SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA, January 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Hinton, No. 113PA06,
SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA, January 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The North Carolina Supreme Court affirmed an intermediate appellate court's decision vacating defendant's conviction for robbery with a dangerous weapon, holding that a defendant's hands are not dangerous weapons for purposes of the robbery with a dangerous weapon statute, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-87.
|
|||||
| State v. Nipper, No. 346PA06,
SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA, January 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
