 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Osborne v. Tatum, NO. COA05-628,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, February 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Parker v. Hensley, NO. COA05-299,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, February 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An award of $500 in attorney fees was remanded because insufficient findings of fact were made by the trial court under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 6-21.1 (2005); there was no findings regarding time and labor expended, skills required, customary fees for like work, and experience and ability of the attorney involved.
|
|||||
| Pendleton Lake Homeowners Ass'n v. Carnell, NO. COA05-812,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, February 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Pipkin v. Pipkin, NO. COA05-539,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, February 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Sink v. Sprinkle, NO. COA05-570,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, February 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Ahmadi-Turshizi, NO. COA05-482,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, February 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court lacked jurisdiction where defendant's indictment failed to allege a substance listed in Schedule I of North Carolina General Statutes, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-89(3). The indictment was fatally flawed because it failed to include "3, 4" as required by Schedule I.
|
|||||
| State v. Allen, NO. COA05-1089,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, February 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Bell, NO. COA05-268,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, February 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Bowens, NO. COA05-828,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, February 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
