 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ward v. New Hanover County, NO. COA05-423,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, February 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's order granting a county summary judgment was affirmed as the marina owners failed to exhaust their administrative remedies under county ordinances, which were enacted under N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 153A-340(c) and 153A-345, by obtaining a formal determination from the county's planning staff as to their proposed use of the marina.
|
|||||
| Wilder v. Hill, NO. COA05-641,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, February 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where decedent's stepson had an adequate remedy in an earlier caveat proceeding, he could not seek a civil remedy. Therefore, the trial court properly dismissed the stepson's complaint on the basis of res judicata and collateral estoppel.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
