 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Animal Legal Def. Fund v. Woodley, NO. COA06-358,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, February 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly entered permanent injunction and custody order to remove animals from animal owners' possession; animal welfare agency did not have to have complaint verified pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 19A-3, involving preliminary injunctions, and N.C. Gen. Stat. § 19A-4, involving permanent injunctions, made no mention of verification.
|
|||||
| Braswell v. St. Paul Mercury Ins. Co., NO. COA06-157,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, February 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Bristow Dev. Co. v. Craver Estates, Inc., NO. COA06-893,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, February 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Brown v. Ginn, NO. COA06-511,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, February 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although a widow did not specifically waive her rights to Tobacco Transition Payment Program payments under an antenuptial agreement, the agreement's language and scope illustrated the parties' intent as to the payments. The widow disclaimed her rights to the decedent's separate property, as well as income and proceeds from that property.
|
|||||
| Burgin v. Owen, NO. COA06-450,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, February 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a wife never signed a contract for sale or an authorized agency, pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 39-13.6(a) (2005), the trial court, inter alia, properly granted the husband and wife's N.C. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss a buyer's complaint for breach of contract and specific performance for failing to state a legally sufficient claim.
|
|||||
| Ceballos v. Intrepid USA, NO. COA06-414,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, February 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| DOT v. Prince, NO. COA06-104,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, February 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Deans v. Terry, NO. COA06-488,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, February 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Emerging Display Techs. v. Unicomp, Inc., NO. COA06-27,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, February 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
