 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. McGee, NO. COA05-1069,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Medley, NO. COA05-750,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Richardson, NO. COA05-215,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Roberts, NO. COA05-288,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: All the trial testimony established that another man held shotgun during incident. Thus, evidence was insufficient to convict defendant of first degree sexual offense, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-27.4. But, remainder of evidence was sufficient to prove defendant committed lesser included offense of second degree sexual offense, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-27.5.
|
|||||
| State v. Scott, NO. COA05-674,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Upshur, NO. COA04-397,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's convictions were affirmed as he was not entitled to a new trial due to the unavailability of the transcript as he did not appeal until years after his conviction. However, defendant's case was remanded for resentencing as the trial court applied an aggravating factor to which defendant did not stipulate and the jury did not find.
|
|||||
| State v. Vareen, NO. COA05-649,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Whitehead, NO. COA05-830,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Strategic Outsourcing, Inc. v. Stacks, NO. COA05-47,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in denying motions to dismiss filed by Arkansas resident, Arkansas business, and Arkansas banking corporation; personal jurisdiction existed over Arkansas resident because he consented to in personem jurisdiction in North Carolina and it existed over the Arkansas banking corporation under a corporate veil-piercing theory.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
