 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Holder, NO. COA06-1103,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, February 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Holt, NO. COA06-826,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, February 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. James, NO. COA06-845,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, February 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Lakey, NO. COA06-602,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, February 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Lee, NO. COA06-988,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, February 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Leyva, NO. COA06-354,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, February 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction was affirmed as defendant failed to show that he was prejudiced by the trial court's error in allowing the parties to dismiss some potential jurors for cause by stipulation of the parties, in the trial court's absence. Defendant's claim was considered, even though he did not comply with N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1211(c).
|
|||||
| State v. McLean, NO. COA06-216,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, February 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's convictions were reversed as trial court made comments that deprived defendant of fair trial and violated his rights to due process when she sustained her own objections, repeatedly interrupted counsel's closing argument, and inserted instruction giving jury impression that other witnesses, including defendant, had criminal records.
|
|||||
| State v. Portis, NO. COA06-709,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, February 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Replogle, NO. COA06-152,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, February 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Restitution order in involuntary manslaughter prosecution was improper as the only information as to amount of restitution owed to the victim's father was provided by the prosecutor and did not constitute evidence; the issue was preserved for appellate review under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1446(d)(18) even though defendant did not specifically object.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
