LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - North Carolina - March 7, 2006

  
Armstrong & Armstrong, P.A. v. Rhodes, NO. COA05-146, COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, March 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Avery v. Phelps Chevrolet, NO. COA05-562, COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, March 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Industrial Commission properly awarded a worker temporary total disability benefits and costs for medical treatment because there was sufficient medical evident to support the Commission's findings that the worker's back injuries were causally connected to a fall at the employee's workplace.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Batts v. Batts, NO. COA04-1044, COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, March 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Best v. Moody, NO. COA05-883, COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, March 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Broadbent v. Allison, NO. COA05-194, COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, March 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court did not err in instructing the jury; the jury was properly informed when the trial court gave the special airport nuisance to the jury, and no error occurred when the trial court refused to give a mitigation of damages instruction and declined to structure the issue sheet so the jury could consider individual liability.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Brown v. City of Winston-Salem, NO. COA05-464, COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, March 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Petitioners challenging city's annexation ordinances under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 160A-50 failed to show city misclassified lots or that the county tax maps it relied on were inaccurate. As they offered no reliable evidence that city's methodology was inaccurate and not calculated to provide reasonably accurate results, the ordinances were upheld.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Ceplecha v. Pine Knoll Townes Phase II Ass'n, NO. COA05-173, COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, March 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Amendment to a condominium declaration that allowed decision whether to rebuild or repair to be made by simple majority rather than three-fourths of unit owners, and did not require that at least two-thirds of building be destroyed before such a decision could be made, was void as it conflicted with requirements of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 47C-3-113(h).

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Chambliss v. Health Scis. Found., Inc., NO. COA04-1687, COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, March 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In the medical malpractice case, the trial court properly denied the request of the providers and nurse denying their request under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1D-50 to reduce the punitive damages award. The trial court complied with § 1D-50 in explaining in detail why punitive damages were justified and why such an award was appropriate and not excessive.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Cockerham-Ellerbee v. Town of Jonesville, NO. COA05-576, COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, March 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: If, as plaintiff alleged, officers promised to protect her by arresting her husband for violating a protective order but failed to do so, and her reliance on the promise was causally related to her injury by her husband, officers owed her a "special duty" such that they were not shielded from liability for negligence under the public duty doctrine.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Concord Eng'g & Surveying, Inc. v. Freeman, NO. COA05-550, COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, March 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.