|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
North Carolina - March 7, 2006
|
| |
Connor v. Harless, NO. COA05-355,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, March 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Price was an essential term of a contract. Where an option to buy property stated that the price was to be determined by two appraisals, but failed to specify how to proceed if the appraisals produced vastly different property values, the price term was not, as it needed to be, certain and definite, and the option to buy was unenforceable.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Fox v. Gibson, NO. COA05-826,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, March 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Trial court properly denied a girlfriend's motion to dismiss a wife's claim that the girlfriend alienated the affections of the wife's husband, because the girlfriend's acts of calling, e-mailing, and engaging in sex acts with the husband in North Carolina satisfied the long arm statute, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-75.4(3) (2005), and due process.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|