 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re A.C.F., NO. COA05-764,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, March 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in terminating a mother's parental rights pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-1111(a)(2) (2005) as an agency filed the petition inside the statutory 12-month period for showing progress as the period ran from the entry of the first custody order rather than from the mother's initial voluntary separation from the child.
|
|||||
| In re Foreclosure of Deed of Trust Executed by Hunt, NO. COA05-178,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, March 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re J.G.B., NO. COA05-590,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, March 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re J.N.C., NO. COA05-627,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, March 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re L.D.B., NO. COA05-519,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, March 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The father's appeal of the initial permanency planning order, entered after the father was found to have neglected the child, was not a final order under former N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-1001. The order did not change the plan from reunification to adoption, and it repeated the previous directives of the trial court that reunification be ceased.
|
|||||
| In re S.L.G. , NO. COA05-458,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, March 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Klebba v. Harrah's N.C. Casino Co., L.L.C., NO. COA05-749,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, March 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Locklear v. Lanuti, NO. COA05-900,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, March 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's dismissal of a medical malpractice action for being time-barred under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-15(c) was reversed, because the allegations of the complaint were sufficient to raise an issue of whether the patient was entitled to the benefit of the continuing course of treatment doctrine to toll the expiration of the statute of limitations.
|
|||||
| Mahmoud v. Univ. of N.C. Bd. of Governors, NO. COA05-806,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, March 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
