 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bald Head Ass'n v. Curnin, NO. COA05-639,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, March 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Buckland v. Hobbs, NO. COA05-698,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, March 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Chandley v. First Charter Bank, NO. COA05-873,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, March 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Credle v. Injection Tech., NO. COA05-922,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, March 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Efird v. Parsons, NO. COA05-879,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, March 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ennis v. Henderson, NO. COA05-881,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, March 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not have discretion to extend the time allotted to accept an offer of judgment pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, N.C. R. Civ. P. 68 (2005). Where defendants' offer of judgment was not accepted within 10 days, it was deemed withdrawn, despite a trial court order extending the time to respond to the offer.
|
|||||
| Evans v. Lochmere Rec. Club, NO. COA05-956,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, March 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where owners sought injunction against neighbor for private nuisance after obtaining injunction against neighbor's predecessors for private nuisance, owners were entitled to seek second injunction. Owners, under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, N.C. R. Civ. P. 65(d), could not enforce previous injunction, obtained against predecessors, against neighbor.
|
|||||
| Fariss v. Stroh Cos., NO. COA04-1457,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, March 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Harris v. Pinewood Dev. Corp., NO. COA05-606,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, March 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A preliminary injunction was erroneously granted to purchasers under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-485(2) (2003) in order to prevent a seller from transferring assets pending completion of post-judgment proceedings, as there was no failure of execution on the judgment under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-352 (2005) and no showing under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-355 (2005).
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
