 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Reber, NO. COA06-594,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, March 20, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because indictments alleged dates during year defendant was 16 years old, trial court properly instructed jury it needed to find, beyond reasonable doubt, defendant committed acts, if at all, when he was at least 16. Right to unanimous verdicts was not denied where incidents were clearly separate and no other specific incidents fit into time frame.
|
|||||
| State v. Richardson, NO. COA06-673,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, March 20, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Robinson, NO. COA06-722,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, March 20, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Tucker, NO. COA06-605,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, March 20, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Walters, NO. COA06-917,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, March 20, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was deprived of constitutional right where defendant was not allowed to represent himself despite fact that record showed he was competent, understood, and voluntarily exercised free will, trial court clearly expressed opinion it would be mistake for defendant to represent himself and warned defendant he would have to "play by the rules."
|
|||||
| Watts v. N.C. Dep't of Env't & Natural Res., NO. COA06-299,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, March 20, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of motion to dismiss was affirmed as special duty exception to public duty doctrine applied as North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) issued owner improvement permit warranting that he could construct home on property, owner relied on permit, and NCDENR revoked permit, causing owner additional expenses.
|
|||||
| Webb v. Hardy, NO. COA06-907,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, March 20, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Grant of summary judgment to a doctor in a patient's negligence action was affirmed because the continuing course of treatment doctrine was inapplicable as there was no competent evidence to suggest that the patient's severed nerve could be restored or repaired. Thus, applying N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 1-52(16) and 1-15(c), the claim was time-barred.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
