 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re C.T., NO. COA06-923,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under N.C. Const. art. IV, § 12 and N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 7B-1101 and 7B-1106(a), a trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to terminate a mother's parental rights in her older child because a summons pertaining to the child was not issued; however, sufficient evidence supported the finding that the mother neglected a younger child.
|
|||||
| In re E.H., NO. COA06-818,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Foreclosure of Lien by Ridgeloch Homeowners Ass'n, NO. COA06-991,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A superior court properly ordered a judgment against a high bidder to be set aside where a mortgage holder's foreclosure of the property had been consummated with delivery and recordation of a deed, that foreclosure extinguished a homeowner association's junior lien, and thus, the association should have ceased all effort to foreclose.
|
|||||
| In re Hudson, NO. COA06-345,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not exceed its authority by examining the underlying validity of the loan documents in a foreclosure proceeding, because such an inquiry related to the finding of a "valid debt" under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 45-21.16. The trial court properly found that the debt claimed by the lender pursuant to the note was not valid.
|
|||||
| In re J.R.B., NO. COA06-1583,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re M.M., NO. COA06-600,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re T.B.J.B., NO. COA06-1303,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re T.J.D.W., NO. COA06-1323,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly found that it had jurisdiction to enter custody and termination orders under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 50A-201(a) because, at time of petition, child was in custody of department in North Carolina, mother had moved to North Carolina with child 18 months earlier, and at the date of the petition, was incarcerated in North Carolina.
|
|||||
| In re V.E.B., NO. COA06-933,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
